The Power to "Interpret"

Limitations of the Courts

For quite some time now, the courts have assumed an unconstitutional power that they were never granted by the People via Article III of the U.S. Constitution. Simply stated, this assumed power is the power to interpret…

When reading any contract, compact or legal document, the definitions in effect at the time of the adoption are the definitions that must be applied throughout the life of the contract, as those were the true meaning and intent of the parties involved at the time of agreement. No other words or interpretations were agreed to or ratified by the parties.

At the adoption of our Declaration, Constitution and Bill of Rights, our Charters of Freedom, the word “interpret” had a very narrow and limited meaning.

INTER'PRET, verb transitive [Latin interpretor, from interpres.]

1. To explain the meaning or words to a person who does not understand them; to expound; to translate unintelligible words into intelligible ones; as, to interpret the Hebrew language to an Englishman.

In addition to the courts pretending as though they have the authority to micro-manage the Oval Office and all Executive Branch decisions, when in fact, “The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America” (not the courts), is the example of the U.S. Supreme Court using their politically motivated “imagination” not “interpretation” to find a “right to gay marriage” in the 14th Reconstruction Naturalization Amendment.

Of course, the 14th has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with “marriage rights,” gay or otherwise. But that didn’t stop the unelected branch of our government from using its politically motivated imagination, on this issue and many others. The 14^th is one of three “reconstruction” amendments narrowly tailored for former slaves and their families post-Civil War. It was never intended for how our courts have fraudulently “misinterpreted” that amendment since.

In other words, our courts are currently totally untethered from the Constitutional boundaries set in Article III of the Constitution, and they have been for well over a hundred years now.

Sooner or later, the People will be forced to put an end to the practice of British Common Law in the USA. If they don’t, then this isn’t a democracy, republic or constitutional government at all.

In closing, our Charters of Freedom were intentionally written and ratified in plain English, not legalese or some foreign language. Therefore, anyone who can read and comprehend English, needs no one to “interpret” those documents.

The minute you ask anyone else to interpret plain English for you…you are admitting you are too ignorant to properly interpret those words for yourself. This goes for Trump and his advisors as well!